Critical Reflection on Professional Practitioner Inquiry
Looking back
over the journey that has been module two, one thing stood out and got me
thinking. I‘d gone through the tasks laid out by the university which have guided
me in gaining knowledge and information needed to put together a solid inquiry
proposal. But what really gave me food for thought was the pivotal moments of
change and enlightenment that have occurred throughout this process. Moments
where the clouds parted, and words and ideas fell off the tip of my tongue.
It’s these moments that I’ve chosen to reflect on, not merely because the
thoughts and decisions made at these times have signposted the direction of my
inquiry but because of the circumstance in which these epiphanies have
occurred.
Whilst developing
my lines of professional inquiry I learnt the importance of questioning my
practice whilst looking for gaps or barriers to use as problems to research. Rosemary’s
blog inspired a moment of clarity where she says ‘A great quality to have in
this endeavour is one of curiosity - to develop an inquiring mind. Why should
such a thing be? Is that the ‘truth’ and so on. Moreover, this develops a
critical quality in your thinking, which is just what we are looking for on
this programme.’ (Appendix A). Rosemary also recommended Freakonomics; a great
read that helped me understand the practical applications of inquiry.
I shared
my initial questions (Appendix B) on my
blog and with colleagues. One communication proved invaluable as my next moment
of enlightenment (Appendix C).
My blog
post 4b (Appendix D) signifies
two more key revelations; firstly, the formation of my Significant Interest Group
(Sig) and secondly a new level of understanding. On my blog I quote ‘It's funny but I've really found that hearing my own
ideas spoken in other people's words has made me able to access that bit of
clarity that seems to constantly be on the tip of my Tongue.’ Comments from
others really are a great example of how sharing can shape your ideas.
Initially
I struggled to see the merit of my inquiry and how it would make a difference. I
came across an inspiring blog by Peter Bryant (Appendix E).
This quotation struck me: ‘They are
not sea-changes nor are they barbarians banging at the gate. There is something
to be said for the idea of from little things, big things grow’. It helped put
my inquiry into context, especially the scale and feasibility.
The campus session on ethics highlighted the value of
attending sessions. We brainstormed everything and anything on ethics until we had
a clearer picture (Appendix
F). I had my next revelation
when Alan proselytized the “less is more” approach to inquiry. At last, I tapered
my ideas into my final inquiry proposal.
Whilst piloting the tools of professional inquiry the
emphasis turned to my Sig and what great support they provided as willing
volunteers (appendix
G).
On reflection, the biggest revelation of this
emotional and mental journey is the realisation that - for the most part - my success is through
engagement with my networks. Networking is an amazing source for a wealth of
information that has assisted me in the ownership of my critical thinking
process. In the future it will play its part in helping me sustain my
professional practice.
No comments:
Post a Comment